Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Not Happy, Clive!

Stephen responds to Clime Hamilton's assult on sanity from earlier in the week.

In usual circumstances, you know that your opponent has lost the debate if they either start playing the man or invoke Godwin's Law. A complete lack of substantive argument can be assured if they do both...

I am keen to engage in a rational debate on climate change, however I judge the chances of my opponents doing the same as quite slim.

If you would like to participate in or support my Higgins by-election campaign, please get in touch.

1 comment:

  1. Best of luck. I am adamantly opposed to the climate change thesis and see it as a blatant excuse to impose yet more rules and regulations on us. Climate change hysteria shows us that we will always have a class of people who want to control and tax us in the name of some fabricated authority, be it god, allah, or gaia.
    I'm hoping that as the end of the world fails to materialise, it will simply fade away as do all end-of-the-world cults.